The focus point is only eye matched due to the difference in expected Z figures (Frisch is 0-256 if I remember correctly) but the results are comparable. It seems a bit faster than Frisch but the testbed is pretty simple so it's hard to tell.īelow is a screen grab with the results, your plug in on the left and Frisch on the right. After I did a rough normalisation to get the zdepth figures between 1 and 0 your beta worked fine (although with some of the options turned off as you say in your post). I've used an old test bed I set up for Frischluft DOF. I've downloaded it and run some quick and dirty tests on a win10 laptop with 32g ram and an i7-4800MQ. Many many users have complained to BMD about this but so far to no effect. In doing so they made it much slower and much less efficient in terms of work flow. A lot of power users are still using fu9 in production due to some seriously bad UI design that appeared in Fu16 onwards - there are loads of posts both here and on Steak Under Water about this, but basically Blackmagic redesigned the much admired Fu9 interface to make it look more like Resolve. Most heavy vfx users use the Fusion Studio stand alone due to UI and performance issues in the Resolve Studio version.Īnd in an ideal world it would also work in Fusion Studio 9. It's worth noting that it would have to work both in Resolve Studio (on the fusion page) and on the stand alone Fusion (studio at least). Finally, I don't think it has ever used GPU processing which limits performance to CPU only which in a pretty heavy plug in is a real limitation.Ī good DOF replacement would I think be enthusiastically taken up by a lot of Fusion users. Also, I've noticed some pretty big performance hits when using it in FuResolve and Fu17 plus, although I haven't had time to quantify this. I've used Frisch for many years and it's very good but hasn't had any development for at least five years, and every time I install a new version of Fusion I expect it to not work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |